In brief
Payments for children
Chancellor
of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown, announced in this year's Budget that
the children's additions to means-tested tax credits and benefits
would be increased by £4.35 per child per week from June and
October respectively. As CPAG had called for a £5.00 increase
in October, followed by a further £5.00 in April 2001, this
was a welcome step in the right direction. It would, of course, be
too bold to claim that the Chancellor's decision was a response to
our press statements, but the fact that such increases are debated
as realistic possibilities represents a very real change in the policy
climate.
Nevertheless,
it remains important that means-tested benefits, including tax credits,
should not make all the running in developing a decent system of
financial support for families with children. In this respect, it
is perhaps worrying that the Chancellor also announced (albeit 'at
least') a mere 50p. a week increase in child benefit for the first
child, with 30p. for subsequent children, from April 2001. Moreover,
it appears that this includes the normal inflation uprating, which
is not yet known at the time of writing but which makes the promised
increase even more modest.
Child benefit,
with its simplicity, its ready portability as circumstances change,
its very high take-up and the fact that it does not contribute to
the poverty trap, has many advantages over means-tested payments.
Recent improvements in its value have been very welcome, but continued
vigilance is obviously needed.
Which brings
us to the integrated child credit (ICC). From April 2003, the Government
proposes to roll up the means-tested children's additions with next
April's new children's tax credit to create a combined means-tested
credit, payable whether or not parents are in work and regardless
of which benefits they receive.
Many issues
surround the proposed ICC (see, for example, Jane Millar's article
in Poverty 106) – not least the right combined level for
child benefit plus ICC and the level of adult income at which the
ICC should begin to taper away. CPAG is currently making representations
to the Government on these and other matters.
Whatever may
be the right level for the ICC, it is apparent both from academic
evidence and from the perspective of common sense that existing
benefits are far adrift of a decent standard which could lift children
clear of poverty and social exclusion. For this reason, progress
needs to be maintained now. CPAG is calling for a further £5.00
a week increase in the means-tested children's additions from April
2001, after normal indexation, as well as a £2.00 a week real
increase in child benefit.
The emergence
of the ICC also provides the opportunity to develop minimum income
standards to act as targets for family incomes (see John Veit-Wilson's
article in Poverty 105) – as the Government's pledge to end
child poverty must surely require.
Poverty 107, Autumn 2000
|